Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
+2.3%
Secondary
Market
—
Aestus
40.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
—
Result
Market
38.9%
Aestus
38.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
-0.9%
Settled
Women Argentine Division 1 · 2026-07-28 01:58
· Aestus
Little Boca Women's Football vs San Lorenzo WomenLittle Boca Women's Football vs San Lorenzo Women
Predicted1-0
Actual1-2
Core setup [2.5] is fine, secondary choice is mainly [0] for Flow Defense, expected to be a low-score stalemate
Primary[2.5] Under✗SecondaryMain[0]—ResultHome✗Goals O/U[2.5] Under
✗
Unlock market reference pricing and deep analysis for this match — full-market pricing, weight allocation, actuarial narrative, and recommendation grid.
Virtual credits are for statistical research only · Unlocks are permanent for this match
✓Unlocked · Loading deep analysis…
★
Deep analysis
🔒
Loading quantitative analysis
Failed to load analysis. Please refresh the page.
Asset weight allocation
Full-time HAD probabilities
Half-time HAD probabilities
Market implied pricing vs Aestus probability
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
Dimension
Market implied %
Aestus %
Premium rate
Market recommendations
Asset weight metrics on this platform are for FPL virtual points allocation and statistical probability research only — not financial investment advice.
Actuarial narrative
This content is machine-translated for reference only; the Traditional Chinese version prevails.
In-depth analysis
In this women's Argentine League A match, Little Bulgaria Women's Football Team will face San Lorenzo Women's Football Team at home. According to the market structured pricing, the implied winning rate after deducting the entire game is: home win 38.9%, draw 32.4%, away win 28.7%. The probability of a draw is over 30% and the home win has no absolute advantage (implied market pricing 2.25), showing that the overall strength gap between the two teams is small.
The most significant data structure of this game is extreme goal bias in the low zone: [2.5] The small goal size (Under 2.5) is priced as low as 1.40 (implied probability exceeds 70%), while the high zone market gives a high discount of 2.68; the top three highs in the market are 1:0 (5.2), 0:0 (5.2) and 1:1 respectively. (5.5), the half-time score was as low as 1.89 0:0. This shows that market institutions and market funds have a high degree of consensus on the low-scoring deadlock in this game. The two teams have strong discipline on the defensive end and relatively limited means to break the game.
Under the conditions where the risk of a draw is high (32.4%) and the probability of the home win is less than 52%, the direct layout of home and guest and the steering wheel are risky. Therefore, the allocation is based on low score [2.5] Fine as the first choice asset, supplemented by Main[0] (handicap handicap) to prevent the risk of draw.
Report content is protected; unauthorized copying or redistribution is prohibited.