Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
+4.5%
Secondary
Market
—
Ordo
30.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
—
Result
Market
80.9%
Ordo
66.7%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
-14.2%
Unlock market reference pricing and deep analysis for this match — full-market pricing, weight allocation, actuarial narrative, and recommendation grid.
Virtual credits are for statistical research only · Unlocks are permanent for this match
✓Unlocked · Loading deep analysis…
★
Deep analysis
🔒
Loading quantitative analysis
Failed to load analysis. Please refresh the page.
Asset weight allocation
Full-time HAD probabilities
Half-time HAD probabilities
Market implied pricing vs Ordo probability
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
Dimension
Market implied %
Ordo %
Premium rate
Market recommendations
Asset weight metrics on this platform are for FPL virtual points allocation and statistical probability research only — not financial investment advice.
Actuarial narrative
This content is machine-translated for reference only; the Traditional Chinese version prevails.
In-depth Analysis
Tactics and Game Dynamics:
In this Scottish Premiership match, the dominant Celtic host Dundee hosted Dundee. The market has given Celtic a strong backing, with an initial implied probability of a home win as high as 80.9% (1.09), and Asian handicap asset allocation at 1.86 for the home [-2] one, highlighting the huge gap between the two teams in squad depth and tactical execution. At home, Celtic possesses strong possession and dominance and attacking pressure; For Dundee's away game, they are expected to adopt an extreme low-block strategy, aiming for victory without players and seeking to win while losing less is worth winning.
Market Pricing and Handicap Actuarial Calculations:
Over/Under Threshold (3.5 balls): The market is set at a baseline of 3.5 balls, with a high zone of 1.87 and a low of 1.83. It is worth noting that the top three implied correct scores in the market are 2:0, 3:0, and 2:1, with their total goals not exceeding 3. This suggests that the club is cautious about Celtic's heavy run, and controlling the pace of breaking the dense defense could lower the overall goal tally.
Handicap Value Assessment: Celtic giving a two-goal handicap (Home [-2]) is expected to break through the line, but considering the uncertainty of shot conversion rates under the visitors' dense defense, simply asset allocation on a deep handicap carries a certain risk of back-and-forth, while over/under margins are more stable.
Comprehensive Decision-Making:
With extremely low and overheated home win market pricing, combined with popular correct score data, [3.5] Detail offers the highest confidence and data protection as the core configuration; Secondary pick: Home[-2] Capitalize on the spread effect of Celtic's big win over the ball.
Report content is protected; unauthorized copying or redistribution is prohibited.