Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
+5.3%
Secondary
Market
—
Ordo
30.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
—
Result
Market
49.8%
Ordo
42.9%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
-6.9%
Settled
Australian NPL - Queensland · 2026-08-01 16:00
· Ordo
Lions FC vs Peninsula PowerLions FC vs Peninsula Power
Predicted2-1
Actual1-0
Core setup [3.5] Detailed, secondary choice is main [0] Water Flow Defense
Primary[3.5] Under✓SecondaryMain[0]—ResultHome✓Goals O/U[3.5] Under
✓
Unlock market reference pricing and deep analysis for this match — full-market pricing, weight allocation, actuarial narrative, and recommendation grid.
Virtual credits are for statistical research only · Unlocks are permanent for this match
✓Unlocked · Loading deep analysis…
★
Deep analysis
🔒
Loading quantitative analysis
Failed to load analysis. Please refresh the page.
Asset weight allocation
Full-time HAD probabilities
Half-time HAD probabilities
Market implied pricing vs Ordo probability
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
Dimension
Market implied %
Ordo %
Premium rate
Market recommendations
Asset weight metrics on this platform are for FPL virtual points allocation and statistical probability research only — not financial investment advice.
Actuarial narrative
This content is machine-translated for reference only; the Traditional Chinese version prevails.
In-depth Analysis
Tactical and Market Pricing Bias Assessment:
For this Australian National League - Queensland match, the market prices are FC Lions at 1.83 for home win, 4.0 for a draw, and 2.96 for an away win, implying a home win probability of about 48.2%. This data falls within a typical gray area of 42%–52% of wins and losses, so simply choosing the home win three-way handicap carries certain directional risk.
Looking at the market structure structure, the market baseline for total goals is as high as 3.5 goals, but the low-end pricing for '[3.5] small' has dropped to 1.75 (implied probability over 53%), indicating that capital and institutional actuarial investors are relatively cautious about the emergence of extremely high scores. The highest implied correct score rankings are 2:1, 1:1, and 2:2, with the predicted total goals mostly falling between 2 and 3 goals.
On-the-spot Arrangement Logic:
When confidence in the direction of victory is limited, the decision tree model should prioritize targeting goals with higher marginal confidence. With an estimated score of 2:1 (total 3 goals), "[3.5] Small" features an excellent safety margin and safety pad, and is set as the primary core setup; In terms of direction, the Asian handicap 'home[0]' is used as the secondary option to guard against the risk of draws going down.
Report content is protected; unauthorized copying or redistribution is prohibited.