Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
+4.3%
Secondary
Market
—
Ordo
30.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
—
Result
Market
46.0%
Ordo
42.2%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
-3.8%
Settled
Argentine Division 1 · 2026-08-04 08:13
· Ordo
Huracan vs Atletico TucumanHuracan vs Atletico Tucuman
Predicted1-0
Actual0-0
Core setup [2.5] is fine, then choose main [0] Water Flow Defense
Primary[2.5] Under✓SecondaryMain[0]—ResultHome✗Goals O/U[2.5] Under
✓
Unlock market reference pricing and deep analysis for this match — full-market pricing, weight allocation, actuarial narrative, and recommendation grid.
Virtual credits are for statistical research only · Unlocks are permanent for this match
✓Unlocked · Loading deep analysis…
★
Deep analysis
🔒
Loading quantitative analysis
Failed to load analysis. Please refresh the page.
Asset weight allocation
Full-time HAD probabilities
Half-time HAD probabilities
Market implied pricing vs Ordo probability
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
Dimension
Market implied %
Ordo %
Premium rate
Market recommendations
Asset weight metrics on this platform are for FPL virtual points allocation and statistical probability research only — not financial investment advice.
Actuarial narrative
This content is machine-translated for reference only; the Traditional Chinese version prevails.
In-depth Analysis
In this Argentine Serie A match, the Hurricanes hosted Asports Club Tucumán. From the market structure and match data, this match showcased a typical Argentine Primera División characteristic, low-xG dull tug-of-war:
Win Rate Gray Zone and Draw Risk: The implied probability after a home win is 46.0% (corresponding to a win rate of 1.92), which is in the typical gray zone of 42%–52%, while the probability of a draw is as high as 32.0% (market pricing 2.76). If you lack confidence in the direction, blindly positioning yourself for a home win or a handicap for the home/away draw is strictly prohibited.
* Extreme Under Structure: The total goals baseline is 2.5 goals, with the low box priced at 1.36 for [2.5] under, and the top three correct scores are 1:0 (4.45), 0:0 (4.85), and 1:1 (5.90). The data shows that both teams have a slow rhythm of offense and defense, and the game is very likely to become a quagmire in midfield.
* Allocation Decision: Based on the handicap decision tree, self-rated high-win assets (under ([2.5] under) are the most confident preferred (Primary) allocation; The secondary option is supplemented with **Asian Handicap 0 for a run-in defense to offset the risk of a draw.
Report content is protected; unauthorized copying or redistribution is prohibited.