Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
+6.7%
Secondary
Market
—
Ordo
30.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
—
Result
Market
48.0%
Ordo
42.2%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
-5.8%
Settled
Copa Sudamericana · 2026-07-29 06:00
· Ordo
Tigre vs Montevideo NacionalTigre vs Montevideo Nacional
Predicted1-0
Actual1-2
Core setup [2.5] is fine, then choose main [0] Water Flow Defense
Primary[2.5] Under✗SecondaryMain[0]—ResultHome✗Goals O/U[2.5] Under
✗
Unlock market reference pricing and deep analysis for this match — full-market pricing, weight allocation, actuarial narrative, and recommendation grid.
Virtual credits are for statistical research only · Unlocks are permanent for this match
✓Unlocked · Loading deep analysis…
★
Deep analysis
🔒
Loading quantitative analysis
Failed to load analysis. Please refresh the page.
Asset weight allocation
Full-time HAD probabilities
Half-time HAD probabilities
Market implied pricing vs Ordo probability
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
Dimension
Market implied %
Ordo %
Premium rate
Market recommendations
Asset weight metrics on this platform are for FPL virtual points allocation and statistical probability research only — not financial investment advice.
Actuarial narrative
This content is machine-translated for reference only; the Traditional Chinese version prevails.
In-depth analysis
Tactics and Cup Layout: This game is a South American Club Cup match. Argentina’s Tigre plays at home against the Uruguayan giant Monteverde Nacional. The tactical style of the knockout/intercontinental stage of the South American Cup is generally cautious. Visiting teams often prioritize building up the midfield and backfield defenses when traveling across borders. While the home team has tactical dominance at home, it faces high-intensity confrontation and attacks at a slow pace, and the two sides can easily fall into stalemate hand-to-hand combat in the midfield.
Data and market pricing: The market gives a home win of 1.84 (implied probability of about 48.0%), which is in the gray zone game range of 42%–52%; a draw of 3.25 and an away win of 3.55, showing that the winning rates of the three winning and losing directions are scattered. In terms of goal size, [2.5] low zone (thin ball) pricing is as low as 1.67. The market and actuarial model have a very high consensus on low-scoring stalemate situations.
Core Configuration Logic: Given that the direction winning rate is in the gray area and the risk of a draw is high, it is extremely risky to directly take the main win (result). According to the decision tree, the [2.5] fine with the highest degree of certainty should be given priority as the core configuration (primary); the second choice should be paired with the Asian handicap main[0], which can not only lock in the unbeaten trend of the home team, but also prevent withdrawals due to draws.
Report content is protected; unauthorized copying or redistribution is prohibited.