Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
+5.0%
Secondary
Market
—
Ordo
30.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
—
Result
Market
43.5%
Ordo
40.1%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
-3.4%
Settled
Brazilian Division 1 · 2026-07-31 08:30
· Ordo
Coritiba vs CruzeiroCoritiba vs Cruzeiro
Predicted0-1
Actual0-1
Core setup [2.5] Fine, secondary pick [0] Defense to the tie
Primary[2.5] Under✓SecondaryGuest[0]—ResultAway✓Goals O/U[2.5] Under
✓
Unlock market reference pricing and deep analysis for this match — full-market pricing, weight allocation, actuarial narrative, and recommendation grid.
Virtual credits are for statistical research only · Unlocks are permanent for this match
✓Unlocked · Loading deep analysis…
★
Deep analysis
🔒
Loading quantitative analysis
Failed to load analysis. Please refresh the page.
Asset weight allocation
Full-time HAD probabilities
Half-time HAD probabilities
Market implied pricing vs Ordo probability
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
Dimension
Market implied %
Ordo %
Premium rate
Market recommendations
Asset weight metrics on this platform are for FPL virtual points allocation and statistical probability research only — not financial investment advice.
Actuarial narrative
This content is machine-translated for reference only; the Traditional Chinese version prevails.
In-depth analysis
This Brazilian League match pits Corediba against Coats Road at home. From the perspective of market index and quantitative structure, this game presents a very representative pattern of low total goals (low xG) and the away team's slight advantage:
Offensive Efficiency and Expected Value (xG) Analysis: The benchmark line for the size of goals in the whole game is set at [2.5], among which the "thin ball" low zone is priced as low as 1.65 (implied probability of about 60.6%), reflecting that the two teams tend to be cautious and conservative in terms of offensive and defensive rhythm. Corediba mostly adopts defensive counterattack tactics in home games, and the midfield advance is slow under intensive defense; although Coats Road has a slightly higher combat power (the away win rate is about 43.5%), its ability to break the game away from home is limited, making it difficult to form continuous suppression.
Market Pricing and Win-Loss Gray Zone: Customer win 2.03 is in the typical gray zone of 42%–52%, and the implied probability of a draw is as high as 28.9% (tie pricing 3.05). When there is insufficient confidence in the direction of victory or defeat, the risk of direct investment is extremely high.
Asset Allocation Decision: According to the decision tree model, when the confidence in the direction of victory is limited to the gray area and the consensus on low total goals is very strong, [2.5] Fine is the first choice asset (Primary) with the highest hit rate and confidence; the second choice (Secondary) is paired with Off[0] draw handicap to ensure a defensive performance in the situation of a draw at Coats Road.
Report content is protected; unauthorized copying or redistribution is prohibited.