Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
+2.7%
Secondary
Market
—
Ordo
30.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
—
Result
Market
47.2%
Ordo
44.3%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
-2.9%
Settled
Swiss Super League · 2026-08-02 00:00
· Ordo
Zurich vs ServetteZurich vs Servette
Predicted1-2
Actual2-1
Core configuration [2.5] large, secondary pick [0] water flow defense
Primary[2.5] Over✓SecondaryGuest[0]—ResultAway✗Goals O/U[2.5] Over
✓
Unlock market reference pricing and deep analysis for this match — full-market pricing, weight allocation, actuarial narrative, and recommendation grid.
Virtual credits are for statistical research only · Unlocks are permanent for this match
✓Unlocked · Loading deep analysis…
★
Deep analysis
🔒
Loading quantitative analysis
Failed to load analysis. Please refresh the page.
Asset weight allocation
Full-time HAD probabilities
Half-time HAD probabilities
Market implied pricing vs Ordo probability
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
Dimension
Market implied %
Ordo %
Premium rate
Market recommendations
Asset weight metrics on this platform are for FPL virtual points allocation and statistical probability research only — not financial investment advice.
Actuarial narrative
This content is machine-translated for reference only; the Traditional Chinese version prevails.
In-depth Analysis
From the perspective of tactical structure and market pricing, this is a typical showdown where the visitors are strong and the host is weak, but the direction is in the gray zone.
Tactical Matchups and Offensive Expectations:
Servette's attacking pressure and possession-based efficiency were significantly superior to Zurich's. However, when playing at home, Zurich tends to tighten their defense, using quick counterattacks to find the net. The market has given the 'Under Goals' market pricing a 2.5-goal underdog (over 1.56), reflecting strong institutional expectations for defensive gaps and open attacking scores (the top three favorites are 1:1, 1:2, and 0:1).
Gray Zone Evaluation of Winning Direction:
Sevite's implied probability of an away win is about 48.8%, falling into the gray zone with a 42%–52% chance of winning. Although the away team has the advantage, the risk of a draw away (implied 24.5%) cannot be ignored. There is some fluctuation in win rates for direct away wins or handicap wins.
Asset Allocation Decisions:
Based on the "high confidence first" principle,[2.5] the self-rated probability of over-ball reached 62%, making it the most certain asset allocation in the entire match; The second choice uses Handicap Sevet Away[0], which ensures coverage for away wins while providing a play-through defense against draws.
Report content is protected; unauthorized copying or redistribution is prohibited.