Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
+4.2%
Secondary
Market
—
Ordo
30.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
—
Result
Market
48.2%
Ordo
43.7%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
-4.4%
Settled
US Major League · 2026-08-02 08:30
· Ordo
Minnesota Utd vs San Diego FCMinnesota Utd vs San Diego FC
Predicted2-1
Actual1-1
Core setup [3.5] Detailed, secondary choice is main [0] Water Flow Defense
Primary[3.5] Under✓SecondaryMain[0]—ResultHome✗Goals O/U[3.5] Under
✓
Unlock market reference pricing and deep analysis for this match — full-market pricing, weight allocation, actuarial narrative, and recommendation grid.
Virtual credits are for statistical research only · Unlocks are permanent for this match
✓Unlocked · Loading deep analysis…
★
Deep analysis
🔒
Loading quantitative analysis
Failed to load analysis. Please refresh the page.
Asset weight allocation
Full-time HAD probabilities
Half-time HAD probabilities
Market implied pricing vs Ordo probability
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
Dimension
Market implied %
Ordo %
Premium rate
Market recommendations
Asset weight metrics on this platform are for FPL virtual points allocation and statistical probability research only — not financial investment advice.
Actuarial narrative
This content is machine-translated for reference only; the Traditional Chinese version prevails.
In-depth Analysis
Tactical and Market Pricing Bias Assessment
In this MLS game, Minnesota United hosted San Diego FC. Based on the latest implied market pricing, Minnesota United's home win is at 1.83 (about 48.2% win rate after margin winning), currently in the gray range of 42%–52%. Within this range, pure home win direction carries higher volatility risk, and directly using home win as the primary execution asset carries greater win rate risk.
Goal Size and Overall Rhythm
The baseline for under goals in this match is 3.5 goals, with the low zone priced at only 1.60 (implied probability about 59%–62%), indicating a strong market bias toward low total goals. Combined with popular correct score options (1:1, 2:1, 2:2), it reflects limited explosiveness in attack, while defense favors close combat and speed control in midfield. Minnesota United's home games tend to be more steady, while San Diego FC's tough away games often end in low scores.
Asset Allocation Strategy
Based on the structure of 'win rate gray zone + small-small' structure, the asset with the highest confidence in this match is [3.5] small; In terms of directional setup, the Asian handicap Home[0] was used as the secondary choice, completing a play-through defense with the home team slightly ahead but with a draw risk (23.8%).
Report content is protected; unauthorized copying or redistribution is prohibited.