Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
+4.3%
Secondary
Market
—
Ordo
40.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
—
Result
Market
45.7%
Ordo
42.0%
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
-3.7%
Settled
UE Conference · 2026-07-31 01:30
· Ordo
Beitar Jerusalem vs AEK RayanakaBeitar Jerusalem vs AEK Rayanaka
Predicted1-0
Actual2-3
Core setup [2.5] is fine, then choose main [0] Water Flow Defense
Primary[2.5] Under✗SecondaryMain[0]—ResultHome✗Goals O/U[2.5] Under
✗
Unlock market reference pricing and deep analysis for this match — full-market pricing, weight allocation, actuarial narrative, and recommendation grid.
Virtual credits are for statistical research only · Unlocks are permanent for this match
✓Unlocked · Loading deep analysis…
★
Deep analysis
🔒
Loading quantitative analysis
Failed to load analysis. Please refresh the page.
Asset weight allocation
Full-time HAD probabilities
Half-time HAD probabilities
Market implied pricing vs Ordo probability
Absolute gap between the calibration model probability and the market-implied probability. Larger gaps signal greater divergence from market consensus.
Dimension
Market implied %
Ordo %
Premium rate
Market recommendations
Asset weight metrics on this platform are for FPL virtual points allocation and statistical probability research only — not financial investment advice.
Actuarial narrative
This content is machine-translated for reference only; the Traditional Chinese version prevails.
In-depth analysis
Tactics and Market Game: Beitar Jerusalem vs. Cyprus powerhouse AEK Larnaca. The market's current main win pricing is 1.93 (implied probability after water removal is about 45.7%), draw 3.15 (28.0%), and customer win 3.35 (26.3%). The probability of a draw is 28.0%, and the direction of victory or defeat falls into the typical gray area of medium to low confidence.
Handicap Structure Features: The "fine" low zone with a goal size of 2.5 goals is priced as low as 1.69 (high zone 2.04). The market has strong expectations for a low score and boring confrontation in this game; the top three popular wave numbers are 1:0, 1:1 and 2:1 respectively, which also points to a dull rhythm.
Asset Allocation Logic: Due to the high risk of a draw and the cautious nature of both sides in the knockout rounds, the risk of directly winning or losing is greater. The asset with the highest self-assessment confidence is the low total goal pattern [2.5] Fine; at the directional level, Asian Handicap Main[0] is used as the second choice to ensure a full refund in the event of a draw and leakage defense.
Report content is protected; unauthorized copying or redistribution is prohibited.
